A new supervisor I coached spent an entire weekend spiraling. A colleague had shared that one of her team members was crying, feeling micromanaged and untrusted. The feedback, delivered without a source, sent her into a tailspin. “I definitely made very global conclusions of who I was,” she recalled.
This experience exposed a core challenge in her leadership journey: her deep desire to be supportive made her highly sensitive to her team’s emotions, but it also left her vulnerable to internalizing criticism and avoiding the directness her role required.
This is a tension I see every day. Many leaders feel torn between:
- Empathy: The desire to build trust and care for their team as whole human beings.
- Accountability: The need to hold high standards and drive results.
When these two forces feel like they’re in opposition, we get stuck.
The Real Problem: The Leader’s Reactive Default
Here’s what’s happening in your brain: When you have high standards (a core value!), seeing work that is “not good enough” or receiving negative feedback can trigger a cognitive threat response.
This “amygdala hijack” sends you into a reactive, protective state.
- Your “Fight” response looks like over-indexing on authority: micromanaging, creating fear, and eroding trust.
- Your “Flight” response looks like over-indexing on empathy: avoiding the hard conversation, letting performance slip, and damaging your own credibility.
This isn’t a character flaw; it’s a cognitive one. You’re not a “bad leader.” You’re just a human whose brain is trying to protect you.
True self-awareness is the bridge. It’s the foundational skill that allows you to intercept this default reaction. It’s what lets you move from a place of anxiety to a place of clarity and purpose.
The Solution: A Simple Practice for Intentional Leadership
Self-awareness isn’t a passive trait; it’s an active practice. It’s a simple, three-part loop that you can run in any high-stakes moment:
- Recognize: This is the internal alarm. It’s the flash of frustration, the tightness in your chest, the “here we go again” thought. The goal is not to stop the feeling, but simply to notice it. Naming it—”I’m feeling defensive”—creates a sliver of space between the feeling and your next action.
- Pause: This is the moment you give your logical brain a chance to catch up. Take one deliberate breath. Feel your feet on the floor. This somatic (body-based) intervention calms your nervous system and signals that you are not in immediate physical danger.
- Choose: Now, from this calmer, clearer space, you can ask: “What is my goal here? What response is most aligned with my values?” You can choose to be curious instead of judgmental. You can choose to set a clear boundary with kindness. You are now acting with intention, not reacting from anxiety.
Case Study: How “Recognize, Pause, Choose” Works in Practice
Let’s look at another client story. A manager inherited a struggling team member and was feeling pressure from senior leadership to remove him. It felt unfair, and she was stuck.
Here is how she practiced the Recognize, Pause, Choose model:
- RECOGNIZE: She recognized the triggers: “When my boss brings up this employee, I feel defensive and anxious. I’m afraid of being seen as a ‘soft’ manager, but I also feel this is unfair.”
- PAUSE: She took the time (in our coaching sessions and through personal practices like journaling) to ground herself. This pause allowed her to separate her fear of her boss from her values as a leader. Namely, fairness and ethical leadership.
- CHOOSE: From this space of clarity, she chose her intent: “to create a fair chance to succeed.”
- She chose to engage with senior leadership, not with defensiveness, but with a clear plan to get objective data.
- She chose to engage with the employee to co-build a clear, measurable improvement plan. This wasn’t a punitive, “gotcha” PIP, but a genuine reboot.
- Her choice led to a series of concrete next steps: defining measurable goals, building in regular check-ins, and implementing a multi-rater audit to get fair, data-driven feedback.
The Outcome: The results were transformational. The team member’s performance improved significantly. Trust and morale across the team increased because they saw accountability applied fairly. The manager proved to her bosses that empathetic accountability drives performance more effectively than quick dismissals.
She later told me, “I realized accountability and empathy aren’t opposites. They’re part of each other.” Her story highlights that self-awareness is the key. Rather than choosing between being kind or firm, leaders just need to build the skill to recognize the tension, pause before reacting, and choose a response aligned with their values.
The System Is the Solution
The “Recognize, Pause, Choose” loop is simple, but applying it under pressure is a sophisticated skill. This is why one-off training workshops fail to create lasting change. You can’t just learn a new system; you have to practice it until it becomes your new default.
My workshops and coaching programs are designed to do exactly that. I partner with organizations to install a complete operating system for empathetic performance, moving these skills from theory to daily practice.
If you’re a leader tired of feeling stuck in the empathy-control toggle, let’s talk.
Book a free consultation to explore how we can build a sustainable culture of leadership for your team.
Further Reading
- For more on reframing punitive performance plans: “It’s Time to Reboot the PIP”
- To explore how this balance prevents exhaustion: “Empathetic Accountability Done Right Prevents Leader Burnout”
- For a guide on the “Choose” step: “An Essential Checklist for Difficult Conversations”
- For a deeper look at the anxiety-driven patterns that self-awareness can solve, read about “The Reformer’s Trap“.
- For a specific 5-step tool to use in the “Pause” moment, see “The Leader’s RESET.”
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: What is compassionate accountability in leadership? A: It’s the practice of holding people to clear standards while also offering empathy, support, and a genuine desire to see them succeed. It’s about being clear and kind, not “nice” and avoidant.
Q: How can a leader be empathetic without being seen as weak? A: Empathy shows strength when it’s paired with clear expectations, healthy boundaries, and consistent follow-through. A leader who listens deeply (empathy) and then makes a clear, value-based decision (accountability) is seen as strong, not weak.
Q: Why is self-awareness important for difficult conversations? A: Self-awareness is what allows you to separate your reaction from your response. It helps you notice when you’re triggered, stay grounded in your values, and choose your words with intention rather than lashing out or shutting down.
Q: What are the signs of leading with too much empathy? A: Common signs include: avoiding necessary difficult conversations, letting performance issues slide, absorbing your team’s stress to the point of your own burnout, and feeling resentful that others aren’t meeting your (unspoken) standards.
Q: What are the signs of leading with too much control? A: Common signs include: micromanaging, needing to be in every meeting, creating fear of failure, and pushing outcomes without listening. This is a key driver of the “doer” mode that burns out new managers.
Pingback: It’s Time to Reboot the PIP – Amy Kay Watson